** what did the supreme court decide in the dred scott case? a. compromise of 1850 was illegal for congress to deprive a slave owner of property (slaves) without due of process. b. missouri compromise was illegal for congress to deprive a slave owner propety (slaves) without due process of law. c. missouri compromise was illegal for congress to deprive a slave from his/her freedom if they lived in the south. d. missouri compromise was illegal because it freed slaves in slave states.

A. identify the constitutional clause that is common to both mccutcheon v. federal election commission (2014) and citizens united v. federal election commission (2010). based on the constitutional clause identified in part a, explain why the facts of citizens united v. federal election commission (2010) led to a similar holding to the holding in mccutcheon v. federal election commission (2014). describe an action that members of the public who disagree with the holding in mccutcheon v. federal election commission could take to limit its impact.