History
History, 09.07.2019 17:40, joe7977

Which statement is true of settlers in the backcountry? a. backcountry farmers lived on large farms, but were isolated from the larger cities and wealthier plantations of the colonies. b. like their counterparts on the plantations and in the cities, women of the backcountry had responsibility only for their own homes and children. c. many of the backcountry farmers lived in small, tidy homes and had a few slaves to assist them with their work. d. backcountry settlers believed that the colonial governments cared only about protecting the wealth of plantation owners.

answer
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 21.06.2019 15:00, jose145
How will thinking on the margin increase the chance of long-term success for your business, even if additional competition enters your community?
Answers: 3
image
History, 21.06.2019 18:40, jazmineweb234
During the invasion of the soviet union, the einsatzgruppen did which of the following? killed large numbers of jews, as well as many locals. led military troops. eliminated local administration in lithuania. took over many administrative functions in the war effort. planned and organized extermination camps.
Answers: 3
image
History, 21.06.2019 19:30, zoeycrew
In the decision for dred scott vs. sanford, (1857) in which a slave petitioned for his freedom in a st. louis court, on the grounds that his owner had taken him into free territory, and thus he ought no longer be regarded as possessing "slave" status, but should be regarded as a free man, the court decided as follows (excerpt): "in the circuit courts of the united states, the record must show that the case is one in which by the constitution and laws of the united states, the court had jurisdiction--and if this does not appear, and the court gives judgment either for plaintiff or defendant, it is error, and the judgment must be reversed by this court--and the parties cannot by consent waive the objection to the jurisdiction of the circuit court. a free negro of the african race, whose ancestors were brought to this country and sold as slaves, is not a 'citizen' within the meaning of the constitution of the united states. when the constitution was adopted, they were not regarded in any of the states as members of the community which constituted the state, and were not numbered among its 'people or citizen.' consequently, the special rights and immunities guarantied to citizens do not apply to them. and not being "citizens" within the meaning of the constitution, they are not entitled to sue in that character in a court of the united states, and the circuit court has not jurisdiction in such a suit. the only two clauses in the constitution which point to this race, treat them as persons whom it was morally lawful to deal in as articles of property and to hold as slaves. since the adoption of the constitution of the united states, no state can by any subsequent law make a foreigner or any other description of persons citizens of the united states, nor entitle them to the rights and privileges secured to citizens by that instrument." why does the court say that the petitioning party in this case had no right to sue for his freedom? a) because he is too young b) because he is from a different state c) because he is "of the african race" with enslaved ancestors d) because he is, properly speaking, within his owner's jurisdiction
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 04:00, luxmimspcbcxf
What happened during the victorian age? a. all social classes lived near each other b. the middle class became much larger c. city populations began to decrease d. families continued to go to work together
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
Which statement is true of settlers in the backcountry? a. backcountry farmers lived on large farms...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 21.01.2021 20:30
Konu
Mathematics, 21.01.2021 20:30
Konu
Chemistry, 21.01.2021 20:30
Konu
Mathematics, 21.01.2021 20:30