Ahistorian is interested in determining whether a new biography of franklin d. roosevelt, the president of the united states from 1933 to 1945, is biased against its subject . which of the following pieces of evidence would be most to her? a) a photograph of roosevelt angrily yelling at a member of his staff b) a speech given by roosevelt's electoral opponent criticizing his economic policies c) a letter from the book's writer discussing how much he hates roosevelt d) a secondary source that describes roosevelt as an overly aggressive leader

C) A letter from the book's writer discussing how much he hates Roosevelt.

Explanation:

If the author openly admits in a letter that he hates Roosevelt, this is a very condemning evidence of bias. The photograph and the speech that are included in the book are not necessarily biased because they simply reflect a fact, and because we do not know the specific purpose they serve in the book. Option D is also wrong because the description of Roosevelt in a secondary source has no relevance to the way it is portrayed in this book.

was a long, primarily nonviolent series of events to bring full civil rights and equality under the law to all americans. the era has had a lasting impact on united states society, in its tactics, the increased social and legal acceptance of civil rights, and in its exposure of the prevalence and cost of racism. in the south violence and fraud in southern elections from 1868 to 1876, which had reduced black voter turnout and enabled southern white democrats to regain power in state legislatures across the south