Which best describes why the sizes of farms in new england were different from farms in the southern colonies? a. (not, wrong) in new england, the soil was rich, the land was flat, and the growing season was long, so the farms were bigger than in the southern colonies. b. in new england, the soil was poor, the land was hilly, and the growing season was short, so the farms were smaller than in the southern colonies. c. in new england, the soil was rich, the land was covered in forests, and the growing season was short, so the farms were bigger than in the southern colonies. d. in new england, the soil was poor, the rivers were distant, and the growing season was long, so the farms were smaller than in the southern colonies.

B. In New England, the soil was poor, the land was hilly, and the growing season was short, so the farms were smaller than in the southern colonies.

Explanation:

The New England hills are long, the mountains and coasts are cut out of glacial reliefs as a result of the retreat of the ice sheets about 18,000 years ago, during the last glacial period. The region's coast, which stretches from southwest Connecticut to northeastern Maine, is dotted with lakes, mountains, marshes and sandy beaches. Inside are the Appalachian Mountains, which stretch across the states of Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire and Vermont. In this mountain range are the White Mountains (NH), which are home to Mount Washington, the highest peak in the northeast of the United States. It is the site of maximum wind speed recorded on Earth.

i believe the answer is a