History
History, 02.09.2019 10:10, alexsk6357

Napoleon had no choice but to invade russia. do you agree with this statement? why or why not?

answer
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 21.06.2019 23:00, christheicebear
Which statement best completes the diagram related to the supreme court’s procedures? a. a party in a lower-court case requests that the supreme court overturn the other court’s ruling in the case. b. federal judges nominate a small number of cases to be overturned by the supreme court. c. congress votes on which court cases should be reviewed by the supreme court. d. the president selects court cases involving new laws for the supreme court to review
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 08:50, johnsont8377
Write about 50 words explaining whether or not this passage supports that explanation. in the introduction, you heard genghis khan’s explanation of why the mongols were successful conquerors in his time. the mongols were illiterate . . and perhaps no more than 700,000 in number. . they were herdsmen on the grassy plains north of the gobi desert, south of siberia’s forests. before the year 1200, the mongols were fragmented, moving about in small bands headed by a chief, or khan, and living in portable felt dwellings. the mongols endured frequent deprivations [hardships] and sparse areas for grazing their animals. they frequently fought over turf, and during hard times, they occasionally raided, interested in goods rather than bloodshed.
Answers: 3
image
History, 22.06.2019 10:00, pearlvldz
Read this sentence from part 2: gandhi's model of resistance and reform was creative, appealing, and successful. what is the point of this sentence? gandhi created a new model for others. gandhi had a creative mind. gandhi had many supporters. gandhi's model was effective.
Answers: 2
image
History, 22.06.2019 12:30, babiea612
This question is based on the following passage. except for a few pigeons, central park was deserted. mist hung above the chilled grass. patches of old snow, scattered here and there, looked like white puddles. the sun hung just above the horizon, casting red and orange streaks across low-hanging clouds. the portly, gray-haired gentleman jogging down the path looked out of place. for one thing, he was dressed in ordinary street clothes, not a sweat suit. also, every few seconds, he looked anxiously back over his shoulder. coming closer to me, i saw that his face was flushed. he was panting, almost gasping. abruptly, looking this way and that, he moved behind a tree. seeming not to notice my presence, he stood with his back against the trunk, panting heavily. after a moment, he poked his head out to survey the path. it was still empty, except for a squirrel that dashed across the path like a furry dart. i checked my watch. it was now 7: 30. mentally marking the time, i aimed my camera toward the man's face. 20. from the paragraph, you can conclude that the portly man is afraid of something. which one of the following elements gives the strongest evidence for that conclusion? a. he isn't dressed in a jogging suit. b. he's panting. c. he hides behind a tree. d. he's running in a nearly deserted park.
Answers: 3
Do you know the correct answer?
Napoleon had no choice but to invade russia. do you agree with this statement? why or why not?...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 01.04.2020 19:35