Answers: 2
Other questions on the subject: History
History, 22.06.2019 01:00, lovelarissa
In 1944, the supreme court upheld the authority of the u. s. government to order the internment of a minority group in the interest of national security, even though there was no evidence that any members of this group were disloyal to the united states. should the same policy be applied today against u. s. muslims or muslim immigrants? why or why not? are these forms of internment different from native reservations? if so how? if not, why?
Answers: 1
History, 22.06.2019 09:20, 23ricorvan
Use the drop-down menus to choose the right phrases to complete the fourth amendment. the fourth amendment states that "the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effec against unreasonable shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon the exclusionary rule states that evidence cannot be admitted if it was gathered during intro done
Answers: 1
History, 22.06.2019 09:50, dantew585
Which of the following is not a reason why the supreme courts power of judicial review is thought to be too powerful? a .no checks and balance in place to ensure that c. courts can change legislation throughmisuse is not occurring with judicial reviewopinionb. no judicial review can occur without presidential d .courts can create legislation through opinionconsent
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
Even though the South lost at Gettysburg, why do you think the Civil War would continue for another...
Questions in other subjects:
