How did Daniel Webster and John Calhoun differ in their opinions about state government?
Webster believed that the state governments were given many powers by the Constitution, while
Calhoun believed states had limited powers based on the Constitution.
Webster believed that the state governments voluntarily entered into an agreement with the federal
government, while Calhoun believed that the agreement was forced upon the states.
О.
Webster believed that the state governments had no say over federal laws, but Calhoun believed that
states had the right to ignore federal laws.
Webster believed that the state governments lacked any rights, while Calhoun believed that state
governments had rights that the federal government granted to them.
Answers: 3
Other questions on the subject: History
History, 21.06.2019 23:30, laurieburgess804
What was the great awakening? a. a religious movement b. a social movement against slavery c. a political rebellion d. a scientific movement
Answers: 2
History, 22.06.2019 05:30, brainzz04
Hey!me its for an important test! ! which issue during the progressive era would most likely have united mary harris "mother” jones and lewis hine? a) ending child labor b) regulating monopolies c) using photography to expose poor working conditions d) exposing the lack of jobs available for untrained laborers
Answers: 1
History, 22.06.2019 07:00, staffordkimberly
Which statement about african americans during the civil war is true? o a. they were granted the vote in the north. o b. they were allowed to attend northern universities. c. they were given deeds to southern plantations. o o d. they enlisted in the union army.
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
How did Daniel Webster and John Calhoun differ in their opinions about state government?
Webster b...
Questions in other subjects:
Chemistry, 30.11.2020 22:10
Mathematics, 30.11.2020 22:10
