History, 16.02.2022 14:00, 23stanforthb

What did the Missouri Compromise and the Compromise of 1850 have in common? * They were designed to allow for the annexation of Texas without upsetting the balance of power between slave and free states
They were both supported by northern states but rejected by the south
They were both presented as alternatives to the Wilmot Proviso
They were both meant to deal with the issue of slavery in new territories

Answers: 3

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: History

History, 22.06.2019 04:30, cococat7773

"the plan of removing the aboriginal people who yet remain within the settled portions of the united states . . approaches its consummation. . an extensive region . . has been assigned for their permanent residence. it has been divided into districts and allotted among them. many have already removed and others are preparing to go. . " removal of southern indians to indian territory, 1835 this passage is most closely related to a) imperialism. b) the civil war. c) westward expansion. d) the french indian war.

Answers: 1

continue

History, 22.06.2019 08:30, booooooooooo37

In atleast 150 words evaluate the effectiveness of the presidential election process in the united states

Answers: 2

continue

History, 22.06.2019 09:00, gharrell03

Brainliestttme : )) -why do people commit acts of terrorism?

Answers: 1

continue

History, 22.06.2019 12:30, Melaniesoberanis

Why did great britain finally send an ambassador to the united states in 1791? a) great britain forgave the colonies for their rebellion. b) the u. s. threatened special trade restrictions on british ships. c) great britain did not want the u. s. to become allies with france. d) the u. s. would seek a closer alliance with spain if great britain did not send an ambassador.

Answers: 3

continue

Do you know the correct answer?

What did the Missouri Compromise and the Compromise of 1850 have in common? * They were designed t...