In the case of Dred Scott vs Sandford what was the ultimate decision? A. Dred Scott would be free but had to return to Missouri for trial.
B. Dred Scott would be freed after a certain period of enslavement.
C. Dred Scott would remain a slave because he didn’t have the right to bring trial.
D. Dred Scott would be a free man because he was living in free territory.

is this question from a book? ?

answer:

it caused mass african migration, african populations to grow, african empires to topple, and racism against slaves to emerge.

background

early european explorers to the americas likely experienced emotions including awe at the vast "new" environment, amazement at meeting "others," the thrill of the unknown, concern for personal safety, desire for personal reward, and longing for their homeland and those left behind. written and pictorial records attributed to europeans provide the bulk of the records of these early travels. impressions of natives as well as native impressions of europeans are frequently framed in the narratives of the explorers. examination of these records indicates the cautious and curious nature of first encounters.

significance

centuries of ignorance, prejudice, and opinions lacking evidence or scholarly research have tainted traditional views of the earliest meetings between native americans (first nations in canada) and europeans. students may come to recognize how the later period of continued exploration, settlement, and interaction was influenced by these early encounters from the st. lawrence river to georgia.

she thought that scott was her dead husband's property.

hope it : )