It's important to examine the reasoning in arguments you read. Valid arguments require logical and effective reasoning. When reasoning is faulty, readers can be led to incorrect conclusions. In that case, readers may dismiss the author's claim altogether. To determine whether the reasoning is valid, you should ask yourself: (select all that apply)

Question 6 options:

Is the development of this argument logical?

Do the author's points connect?

Are the reasons accurate, reliable, and credible?

Do I feel manipulated or tricked by the way the author is presenting this reasoning?

Does this reasoning work together to invalidate the author's main claim?

where is the subject? hahahaha

`stare decisis is a legal doctrine that obligates courts to follow historical cases when making a ruling on a similar current or future case. stare decisis ensures that cases with identical facts be approached in the same way, unless overruled by the same court or a higher court such as the us supreme court. simply put, it binds courts to follow legal precedents set by previous decisions.

stare decisis is a latin term meaning "to stand by that which is decided".

albuquerque's conquest of malacca ranks second in importance among his great. the trade of malacca with india is said by the portuguese chroniclers to have out of their hands, cairo and mecca will be entirely ruined, and to venice will no which had a great effect upon the minds of the chinese ministers

chamberlains goal was to stop the uk ad germany from fighting which he went to hitler and asked if he could sign a peace treaty between germany and the uk