History
History, 16.12.2021 20:10, sarahjohnson5621

Passage 1: What is the translation for, When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which
have connected them with another... a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should
declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

answer
Answers: 3

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 21.06.2019 17:00, j015
Fill in the table below with your annotations
Answers: 1
image
History, 21.06.2019 19:30, zoeycrew
In the decision for dred scott vs. sanford, (1857) in which a slave petitioned for his freedom in a st. louis court, on the grounds that his owner had taken him into free territory, and thus he ought no longer be regarded as possessing "slave" status, but should be regarded as a free man, the court decided as follows (excerpt): "in the circuit courts of the united states, the record must show that the case is one in which by the constitution and laws of the united states, the court had jurisdiction--and if this does not appear, and the court gives judgment either for plaintiff or defendant, it is error, and the judgment must be reversed by this court--and the parties cannot by consent waive the objection to the jurisdiction of the circuit court. a free negro of the african race, whose ancestors were brought to this country and sold as slaves, is not a 'citizen' within the meaning of the constitution of the united states. when the constitution was adopted, they were not regarded in any of the states as members of the community which constituted the state, and were not numbered among its 'people or citizen.' consequently, the special rights and immunities guarantied to citizens do not apply to them. and not being "citizens" within the meaning of the constitution, they are not entitled to sue in that character in a court of the united states, and the circuit court has not jurisdiction in such a suit. the only two clauses in the constitution which point to this race, treat them as persons whom it was morally lawful to deal in as articles of property and to hold as slaves. since the adoption of the constitution of the united states, no state can by any subsequent law make a foreigner or any other description of persons citizens of the united states, nor entitle them to the rights and privileges secured to citizens by that instrument." why does the court say that the petitioning party in this case had no right to sue for his freedom? a) because he is too young b) because he is from a different state c) because he is "of the african race" with enslaved ancestors d) because he is, properly speaking, within his owner's jurisdiction
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 13:40, shauntleaning
Which of the following is not a correct match? select one: a. marius: first to allow landless citizens to become soldiers b. sulla: first general to seize rome and name himself dictator without time limit c. pompey: member of the first triumvirate d. cicero: led campaign against pirates in the mediterranean e. julius caesar: extended roman rule to france and belgium
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 15:20, shyah90
American express has a long history of working for the good of all in its new york community. in 1885, it engaged its employees to raise money to build the pedestal of the statue of liberty, and today has a program to restore, preserve and revitalize historic sites in new york city. these actions by american express are partial fulfillment of the the firm has established for itself as a corporate citizen.
Answers: 2
Do you know the correct answer?
Passage 1: What is the translation for, When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary fo...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 06.05.2020 03:25