Pls help with at least the introduction paragraph pls

It's 6:30 on a cool fall morning, I Just woke up to get some tea, get ready for work. I go out on my balconey and look down apon all the carriages passing by, when I see some horrid black smoke rise from the factory across the river.  "Dang factory gonna kill us all" I mutter.  I had never been on the other side of the river, resricted access ever since I was a kid, But I also knew they were up to some shady stuff. Today was my lucky day if you would call it that, I get to go interview the owners. after I was done with my tea and got dressed, I went down to my garage, grabbed my horses, strapped them to my carriage and I was on my way to the other side of the river. I work for the london times,  I get to do something new every couple of days, like last week I interviewed the people that claimed something about "flying cows and sheep trrorizing the country side."

Sorry I couldn't finish it I have to do something else right now.

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is

answer: the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.

explanation: