History
History, 24.09.2021 21:20, qwertylol12345

Make up a case in which Kate does NOT
have a constitutional right:

answer
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 21.06.2019 19:30, zoeycrew
In the decision for dred scott vs. sanford, (1857) in which a slave petitioned for his freedom in a st. louis court, on the grounds that his owner had taken him into free territory, and thus he ought no longer be regarded as possessing "slave" status, but should be regarded as a free man, the court decided as follows (excerpt): "in the circuit courts of the united states, the record must show that the case is one in which by the constitution and laws of the united states, the court had jurisdiction--and if this does not appear, and the court gives judgment either for plaintiff or defendant, it is error, and the judgment must be reversed by this court--and the parties cannot by consent waive the objection to the jurisdiction of the circuit court. a free negro of the african race, whose ancestors were brought to this country and sold as slaves, is not a 'citizen' within the meaning of the constitution of the united states. when the constitution was adopted, they were not regarded in any of the states as members of the community which constituted the state, and were not numbered among its 'people or citizen.' consequently, the special rights and immunities guarantied to citizens do not apply to them. and not being "citizens" within the meaning of the constitution, they are not entitled to sue in that character in a court of the united states, and the circuit court has not jurisdiction in such a suit. the only two clauses in the constitution which point to this race, treat them as persons whom it was morally lawful to deal in as articles of property and to hold as slaves. since the adoption of the constitution of the united states, no state can by any subsequent law make a foreigner or any other description of persons citizens of the united states, nor entitle them to the rights and privileges secured to citizens by that instrument." why does the court say that the petitioning party in this case had no right to sue for his freedom? a) because he is too young b) because he is from a different state c) because he is "of the african race" with enslaved ancestors d) because he is, properly speaking, within his owner's jurisdiction
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 02:00, fish64
The military dictatorship inviolently reacted to the opposition of the maya, who demanded greater rights for their native population. the genocide inresulted from a struggle between arab nomadic tribes and non-arab agricultural groups. the tutsi were the victims of genocide inat the hands of the hutu rulers.
Answers: 3
image
History, 22.06.2019 02:30, DESI111609
Approximately how many americans, from both the north and the south, were killed in battle during the civil war?
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 04:30, nila49
Which of the following accurately compares the paths to independence of ghana and algeria? ! both nations achieved independence through armed struggle. both nations achieved independence peacefully. ghana achieved independence through armed struggle, while algeria achieved independence peacefully. ghana achieved independence peacefully, while algeria achieved independence through armed struggle.
Answers: 3
Do you know the correct answer?
Make up a case in which Kate does NOT
have a constitutional right:...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 01.07.2021 23:00
Konu
Mathematics, 01.07.2021 23:00