How does ward's description of the Roman government compare to polybius description in Document A and Millar's description in Document B?

Polubius' description is very naive and lacks proper research. It is purely academic and based on a study of the laws and procedures of government, elections and law-making. Millar’s description is more balanced as it adds to the description presented by Polubius but does provide the caveat that such description is only true in form and not in substance. Ward’s description on the other hand is thoroughly researched as he focuses not only on how the Roman Republic was formally organized but how it actually functioned on the ground with regards to civil participation in the selection of candidates and voting rights. It is grounded on empirical evidence provided by historical data and facts that show how the democratic republican principles of the Roman republic were nullified by arbitrary rules and regulations that surreptitiously prevented the majority of citizens to exercise their rights.

Explanation:

Explanation:

Polubius' description is very naive and lacks proper research. It is purely academic and based on a study of the laws and procedures of government, elections and law-making. Millar’s description is more balanced as it adds to the description presented by Polubius but does provide the caveat that such description is only true in form and not in substance. Ward’s description on the other hand is thoroughly researched as he focuses not only on how the Roman Republic was formally organized but how it actually functioned on the ground with regards to civil participation in the selection of candidates and voting rights. It is grounded on empirical evidence provided by historical data and facts that show how the democratic republican principles of the Roman republic were nullified by arbitrary rules and regulations that surreptitiously prevented the majority of citizens to exercise their rights.

answer: the apache, comanche, kiowa, crow, and osage tribes are plains indians.  

relations between the soviet union and the united states were driven by a complex interplay of ideological, political, and economic factors, which led to shifts between cautious cooperation and often bitter superpower rivalry over the years. the distinct differences in the political systems of the two countries often prevented them from reaching a mutual understanding on key policy issues and even, as in the case of the cuban missile crisis, brought them to the brink of war.

the united states government was initially hostile to the soviet leaders for taking russia out of world war i and was opposed to a state ideologically based on communism. although the united states embarked on a famine relief program in the soviet union in the early 1920s and american businessmen established commercial ties there during the period of the new economic policy (1921–29), the two countries did not establish diplomatic relations until 1933. by that time, the totalitarian nature of joseph stalin's regime presented an insurmountable obstacle to friendly relations with the west. although world war ii brought the two countries into alliance, based on the common aim of defeating nazi germany, the soviet union's aggressive, antidemocratic policy toward eastern europe had created tensions even before the war ended.