सूचना लोककथा का अंश पढ़ें और प्रश्नों के उत्तर लिखें। दरवार तरह-तरह के लोगों से भरा था। उनमें बच्चे और बुजुर्ग थे, गृहिणियाँ और धोबिनें थीं, किसान और कचरा बीननेवाले थे, दूकानदार और लिपिक थे, मूर्ख और शानी थे और भी न जाने कितनी तरह के लोग थे। 1. किसने तरह तरह के लोगों को बुलाकर लाया?(1) ( अकबर ने बीरबल ने, बूढी महिला ने ) ,

2. दरबार तरह-तरह के लोगों से भरा था। किसके निर्देशानुसार बीरबल ने ऐसा किया? (1)

3. दरबार में किन किन प्रकार के लोग थे ?(2)

4 इस खंड से दो संज्ञा शब्द चुनकर लिखें (1)
Don't type the answer, I know that we can't type hindi so write in notebook and take photos

Yallah habibi hel me ya, brainy is useless no answer from anyone, my exam is going on now I I don't know anything because I was sick yarrr, so I can't study for hindi. ​

hi did u tell us this and this is okay in the

its a map of something

the quote by walter cronkite contributes to the central idea of the text by supporting the central idea. cronkite argues that what is deemed “right” for and in america may not be good for other countries. this supports the central idea of the text, that the vietnam war was unpopular in america for multiple reasons- including cronkite’s.

during the debate over his landmark energy policy proposal, president jimmy carter failed to consult one of the most powerful senators, louisiana’s russell long, who would have a big say over whether the legislation moved through the upper chamber. this was classic carter. with a strong distaste for congressional politics, the president simply refused to do what most other presidents would consider routine, such as courting key senators. long became so irate with the president that when he was finally invited to a white house dinner, he stood up to ask a question and, before doing so, proceeded to sarcastically introduce himself: “i’m russell long, chairman of the senate finance committee.”

this interaction is a revealing moment in stuart e. eizenstat’s fascinating new history of carter’s presidency. the former peanut farmer from georgia was a president who, according to conventional wisdom, didn’t care much for party politics; nonetheless, in eizenstat’s view, carter’s legacy on domestic and foreign policy has been vastly underappreciated. the author paints carter as a “bold and determined” leader who bravely attacked the challenges of his time. eizenstat goes so far as to argue that carter might very well be the most successful one-term president in american history.