Help will give brainiest DO NOT SPAM OR PUT LINKS WILL REPORT based on Alice Williamson Diary

To what extent can we trust her account of the facts?

Which parts of her diary seem reliable, which parts unreliable?

To what extent might one draw historical facts from her diary by making allowances for her prejudiced point of view?

In what sense are her expressions of prejudice themselves of interest as historical facts?

If you could interview Alice Williamson, what questions would you ask?

What other kinds of historical documents might you be able to examine to find answers to these questions?

What other kinds of documents could an historian consult to set the Williamson diary in an historical context?

What kind of history could be based on the Alice Williamson diary? To what extent is the diary evidence of "what happened" and "what people thought" in 1864? To what extent is it only the record of one deeply prejudiced girl's impressions?

Upon the fall of rome, europe ceased being influenced by the cultures of the mediterranean coast and was more influenced by germanic tribal confederations that had already taken over vast swathes of roman territory, although the influence of rome on the former empire was very strong in legal

[tex]< b> hey  /tex]meer quasim: -  he was the ruler of bangal after meer jafar . in the battle of plassey(1757ad.) sirajuddaula died and the east india company made the ruler of bangal to meer jafar and meer quasim was the son in law of mir jafar and became ruler after replacing meer jafar who himself been suported to east india company.he became ruler in 1760a.d. replacing meer jafar and he started to offense east india company so the result came as the battle of baksar ( 1764 a.d.) which was fought between meer quasim and hector munro . and meer quasim died in this battle and after this battle east india company became the ruler of bangal .robert clive : -  robert clive was the founder of britishers in india . he came in india in 1746 a.d. and was selected as commander-in-chief of british india . at that time sirajuddaula was the nawab of bangal and he banned the import from callicuta hence east india company gathered army and the result came through as the battle of plassey . the battle was fought between siraj-ud-daula and robert clive and sirajuddaula lost that battle and died .the main reason was for the defeat of sirajuddaula that meer jafar cheated him.when robert clive came in india he was just the age of 18 years but when he went back in 1772 a.d. his money was 401,102 pounds .  robert clive was sent in india to reduce cruption in east india company but when he went back to england in 1772a.d. he had to give recommendation for himself as he gathered a lots of money . and in 22 november 1774 he died .