science historian thomas kuhn has said that de revolutionibus was a revolution-making book but not a revolutionary book. how was that book in some ways both classical and conservative

His book was a classic and conservatory as based on several philosophies.

Explanation:

structure of the scientific revolution is a book for the history of the science by the philosophers in a publication that was a landmark in the history, along with philosophy, and sociology. Kuhn argued for an episodic model where there is a cumulative process. His book argued the evolution of scientific theory as proceeding linearly

Are there any answer choices