How did the concept of nationalism contribute to the genocide of the Armenian people during World War I?
A. It gave the Ottoman Empire access to modern weapons that were
extremely deadly.
B. It made Ottoman leaders suspicious of groups that were not
Turkish or Muslim.
C. It resulted in the Ottoman Empire ruling over groups with different
ethnicities and religions.
D. It justified violence against any group perceived as unsupportive
of the Ottoman war effort.

Answer C

Explanation:

hey did it because the Ottoman Empire were suspicious of who wasn’t/ was Turkish or Muslim (something along those lines)

B. It made Ottoman leaders suspicious of groups that were not

Turkish or Muslim.

Explanation:

The Ottoman rulers, like most of their subjects, were Muslim. They permitted religious minorities like the Armenians to maintain some autonomy, but they also subjected Armenians, who they viewed as “infidels,” to unequal and unjust treatment. In spite of these obstacles, the Armenian community thrived under Ottoman rule. They tended to be better educated and wealthier than their Turkish neighbors, who in turn grew to resent their success. This resentment was compounded by suspicions that the Christian Armenians would be more loyal to Christian governments (that of the Russians, for example, who shared an unstable border with Turkey) than they were to the Ottoman caliphate.

isolationism is a doctrine practiced by the united states for much of its history with the aim of not intervening in external affairs that did not pose a real threat to their country. the united states managed to maintain a state of political isolation throughout the nineteenth century and the first part of the xx. few nations have been able to maintain such a position for such a long period of time. historians argue that it is largely due to geographical reasons, given the physical distance between europe and the usa. uu the venataja of this situation is that the national state can spend its resources in satisfying all the needs of its inhabitants, without the need to invest in armament and equipment for a war that does not directly affect the country.

internationalism is a political and cultural movement that advocates for greater political and economic cooperation among nations for mutual benefit. this novimiento was transformed over time, today it includes military intervention in international conflicts with the objective of maintaining peace. the advantage of this move is in the international contacts and the influence developed by the country that carries it forward.

between the two modes of relations between states, i prefer the first, since i believe it is of the utmost importance to satisfy the needs of citizens and work for their development and as a last option to act on the international level.

the answer is "focused on"

lol gave an answer 1 week that's the answer for those who need it in the future xd