Which accurately describes the principle of prior restraint? -States may outlaw types of speech that the federal government may not.

-Malicious speech can be banned prior to its expression.

-The government may not ban speech before it is expressed.

-Newspapers may not print articles about government corruption.

I think the option is B right Malicious speech can be banned prior to its expression.

Explanation:

hope it helps ☺️

he believed that congress would be better not dealing with "lobbyists", or people who seek to influence (a politician or public official) on an issue, since historically, they had problems with these kinds of people. he thought lobbying produces benefits, but should be carefully monitored.

what are the options ?