PLEASE HELP Answer the question below in one paragraph of at least four sentences. Your first sentence should state your opinion. Use specific evidence from this activity to support your answer.

Evaluate the accuracy of the following claim:
"The differences between India and Algeria show that economic imperialism is less damaging to a country than traditional, formal imperialism."

The claim is true due to the fact that formal, traditional imperialism is indeed more damaging to the other than the economic imperialism. Traditional imperialism is a policy or ideology of extending the rule over peoples and other countries, for extending political and economic access, power and control, often through employing hard power, especially military force, but also soft power. Economics imperialism is the economic analysis of non-economic aspects of life, such as crime, law, the family, prejudice, tastes, irrational behavior, politics, sociology, culture, religion, war, science, and research. So as you can see the traditional imperialism has more effective parts, as in extending political and economic access, it makes one country more powerful and therefore more likely to be even more damaging to the other country

The claim, which states, “The differences between India and Algeria show that economic imperialism is less damaging to a country than traditional, formal imperialism,” is true because formal and more traditional imperialism is indeed more detrimental than economic imperialism in the long run. An imperialist policy or ideology is a strategy for extending rule over other countries and peoples, for exercising influence and power, with the use of both hard and soft power. The economic analysis of non-economic issues is known as economic imperialism. It can include topics like crime, law, the family, prejudice, tastes, irrational behavior, politics, sociology, culture, religion, war, science, and research. As is made clear in my previous statements, the traditional form of imperialism does have more effectively damaging parts, such as the extension of political and economic access, which makes one country more powerful and therefore more damaging to the other.

Explanation:

whole lotta ptsd going on

the answer to this question is the third option. hope this