Texas recently passed a bill restricting how people can vote. Among the new restrictions is the banning of drive-through voting. This type of voting is used heavily by non "white" minorities. Do you think this is an effort to limit minorities from voting? Why or why not? HAS TO BE 5 SENTENCES

Answer and Explanation:

I do not consider the banning of drive-through voting as a way of limiting the vote of social minorities, but rather as a way of protecting the confidentiality of these people's votes and preventing cases of fraud or loss of votes. In this case, I believe that banning of drive-through voting is a way of enhancing the vote of social minorities that usually use this method of voting.

That's because drive-through voting takes place by placing ballots in voting boxes. These ballots contain people's votes, which take them to the boxes. This method of voting does not provide electoral security and for this reason it has been questioned and banned in many places, as a way to protect voters' citizenship and the democratic process.

the results of roman expansion produced social conflict and civil war. julius caesar gained power and became a dictator but was then assassinated. the reign of augustus began a long period of imperial rule and peace in the roman empire. rome faced the problems of how to maintain peace, law, and order.

hope this !

brainliest?

george calvert wanted maryland to be a colony where could live safely. because georgia's founders wanted a colony of small farms rather than large plantations, they originally banned under british law in the 1700s, people who owed money could be