5.Is fear of potential future actions a good enough reason to take away a person's or group of people's civil liberties? Why or why not. Help pl

describe a little more.

- "schenck v. united states, case in which the u.s. supreme court ruled on march 3, 1919, that the freedom of speech protection afforded in the u.s. constitution's first amendment could be restricted if the words spoken or printed represented to society a “clear and present danger.” "

- speech aimed to potentially create danger could be banned.

< 3

imma have to go   the third option

sorry if i am wrong hope this

if i am right plz give me brainliest

where's the