History, 24.06.2021 09:20, shongmadi77

The slave laws of South Carolina were likely affected by the fact that: A. Most of its leaders were not Christian.
B. Many of its settlers were artisans.
C. Many of its settlers came from the Caribbean.
D. Most of its land was used for family farming.

Answers: 2

Show answers

Answers

answered: Jamie228

Explanation:

A majority of South Carolinas population and leadership were christian, settlers mostly came from a farming background or looking for opportunity, and they mostly came from Britain.

answered: adahlove

The answer is C. Many of its settlers came from Caribbean. In between 1662 - 1807, Britain shipped almost more than 3.1 Million slaves across the Atlantic Ocean, where Africans where brought to the British owned colonies in the world. Specifically the Caribbeans; they were tasked to work on plantations daily.

answered: Guest

6ix9ine ft. lil baby tic toc.

it's lit.

answered: Guest

a hypothesis is an expected answer to a question, usually based on some theory or prior research. hypothesis testing is a method of determining the viability of a hypothesis. let’s use the us presidential election as an example. there are many hypotheses (questions) about how people feel or whom they will vote for. the only way to know the 100% “truth” about the answers to these questions is to ask every single possible voter – something that is impossible, expensive, time consuming etc. instead, we take samples and use statistics to make “best guesses” about the answer to a particular hypothesis. we never know for sure if our conclusion is right at the time we accept/reject it, but these techniques, when used appropriately can get us close to the truth most of the time (which is a lot better than guessing, flipping coins or throwing darts to get answers).

the tricky part about hypothesis testing is that we have to think somewhat backwards about it – we have to test what is known as the “null hypothesis”. as an example, the hypothesis might be “obama is more popular than romney” while the null hypothesis is “there is no difference in popularity between obama and romney”. we focus on the null hypothesis because it tells us exactly what the expected value of our tests should be (obama popularity = romney popularity) and we can collect data and see if it comes out that way (see next section on “significance”). if it does, then we “accept the null hypothesis” and reject our original hypothesis. if the null hypothesis is disproven, we look at the data to see if our original hypothesis holds (obama> romney).