What conclusion can be drawn from the information in the table? A.
Federalists favored a strong federal government but were unsure how to achieve it.
B.
Republicans occasionally showed a willingness to compromise on states' rights.
C.
Washington's concerns about partisanship in the United States were exaggerated.
D.
Partisan conflicts were part of United States history almost from the beginning.

D. Partisan conflicts were part of United States history almost from the beginning.

Explanation:

The conclusion that can be drawn from the table is that "Partisan conflicts were part of United States history almost from the beginning."

The above statement is evident from the fact that in each of the issues and events, there exist conflicts between two major groups. And considering the dates of these issues and events, and it can be concluded that it occurred in the early days of the United States of America formation. Hence, option D is correct.

Option A is not correct because while the Federalists favored a strong federal government, they have plans on how to achieve it.

Option B is not correct because there is not enough information or evidence to prove that Republicans occasionally showed a willingness to compromise on states' rights.

The option C is not correct because there is nothing like Washington in the table

question: write a report analyzing through articles of confederation.

answer: the articles of confederation the united states constitution was written when the people feared strong government the new nation needed some kind of organization to hold states together to them fend off future attacks and make a stronger support system through the states and people the states bonded through a friendship that best served as a defense against a invasion and states were not allowed to use taxes as a way to discourage treaties, and states were extremely limited in their dealings with foreign nations the strengths were that the congress has the highest power in the nation because of   fear of monarchy congress had the sole power to declare war and assign treaties disputes between states and territorial issues were to be brought to congress and weaknesses were the lack of power given to congress the articles gave congress the power to pass laws but no power to enforce those laws if a state did not support a federal law that state could simply ignore it congress had no power to levy taxes or regulate trade.

explanation: so like every argument they have strengths and weaknesses but in this case there were more weaknesses but they managed o get through it and make an agreement

question answered by

(jacemorris04)