History
History, 13.06.2021 22:00, warnene17

A historian is writing a book about the fall of the Soviet Union. He claims that the country collapsed because it spent too much of its money on its military rather than providing domestic services to its people. What is the best way to determine whether the historians interpretation is valid? A Cite the historian's book in another study of the Soviet Union. B. Corroborate the interpretation with other secondary sources. C. Find out whether the historian has written any other books. D. Find primary sources related to the collapse of other countries.​

answer
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 22.06.2019 02:00, jellybooooo5837
The establishment of columbia as the state capital was important because a) it was located in the heart of the upcountry. b) it was located in the heart of the low-country. c) it was already established as a vital industrial center. d) it represented a compromise location central to most citizens.
Answers: 3
image
History, 22.06.2019 03:30, itscheesycheedar
Who was the redcoat leader (major john pitcairn, militias, ralph waldo emerson, concord, captain john parker)
Answers: 2
image
History, 22.06.2019 08:40, TTHOR1935
Debris tossed into the atmosphere by a meteorite impact can cause greenhouse warming true false
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 09:30, babygreg2001p97abr
What mountains did the first transcontinental railroad cross
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
A historian is writing a book about the fall of the Soviet Union. He claims that the country collaps...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 12.01.2021 01:00
Konu
Mathematics, 12.01.2021 01:00
Konu
Advanced Placement (AP), 12.01.2021 01:00