History, 11.06.2021 21:50, Robloxdemonduckyt
Emmeline Pankhurst was an activist in the United Kingdom during the early 1900s. She was a leader of the suffrage movement that helped gain women the right to vote. In 1912, Pankhurst and several other suffragettes tried to burn down the Royal Theater in Dublin, Ireland, after the British prime minister had gone to a performance there. Over the next two years, suffragettes set fire to several buildings in the United Kingdom. Some people felt that Pankhurst's approval of the violence turned the public against the suffrage movement, but ultimately the UK Parliament granted all women the right to vote in 1928. Interpretation 1 — Pankhurst was justified in using violence because it kept the women's rights movement in the public eye. Interpretation 2 — Pankhurst should not have used violence because it turned people away from supporting the women's rights movement. Which statement best compares the two interpretations of Emmeline Pankhurst's actions?
Answers: 2
History, 22.06.2019 01:00, user1234536
Humans during the paleolithic era used fire for each of the following purposes except a. for cooking meat b. for use as a weapon c. for heat and warmth d. for treating animal hides select the best answer from the choices provided
Answers: 1
History, 22.06.2019 16:30, lilspike420
Several oil companies donate to a pro-fracking interest group after hearing that the federal government plans to pass a law banning fracking in the united states . the interest group then appeals to members of congress in attempt to get them to vote against the bill. which of the following democratic ideals does this scenario best exemplify? republicanism social contract natural rights limited government
Answers: 3
Emmeline Pankhurst was an activist in the United Kingdom during the early 1900s. She was a leader of...
Geography, 08.12.2020 18:30
Mathematics, 08.12.2020 18:30
Computers and Technology, 08.12.2020 18:30
Mathematics, 08.12.2020 18:30
Mathematics, 08.12.2020 18:30