Why does Clay think that accepting Texas as a state would end up “strengthening one part against another part of the common confederacy” and thus causing the Union to dissolve?
THIS IS A 60 POINT QUESTION AND I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST ANSWER ASAP

Clay believed that if Texas is be received into the Union as an integral part of it  then it will destabilize the union and instead of acquiring Texas, it is better to compose and harmonize the present union rather than introducing as new component that would further add to the existing element of discord and distraction. He said that acquisition of foreign land is not right if it is done for strengthening one part against another part of the common confederacy and this can lead to dissolution of the Union

Explanation:

Clay believed that if Texas is be received into the Union as an integral part of it  then it will destabilize the union and instead of acquiring Texas, it is better to compose and harmonize the present union rather than introducing as new component that would further add to the existing element of discord and distraction. He said that acquisition of foreign land is not right if it is done for strengthening one part against another part of the common confederacy and this can lead to dissolution of the Union

the following best describes postwar era writers in their works:

many writers,authors,novelists,poets concentrated more on social art and social writing and stayed away from political writings.

majority rule is most important in a representative democracy.