6. The demand curve Price (s)
Quantity
Is downward sloping because it shows the inverse relationship between price and
quantity demanded
Is downward sloping because it shows the direct relationship between price and
quantity demanded
Is upward sloping because it shows the direct relationship between price and quantity
demanded
Is upward sloping because it shows the inverse relationship between price and
quantity demanded

The correct answer is A. Is downward sloping because it shows the inverse relationship between price and quantity demanded

Explanation

The image shows a graph in which the price ($) and the quantity are related, the relation of these two shows that a higher price leads to a lower quantity and a lower price leads to a higher quantity, so it is an inverse relationship, that is, when one of the two factors increases, the other decreases. This is reflected in a downward slop trend, that means the line goes down or it decends in the graph. According to the above, the correct answer is A. Is downward sloping because it shows the inverse relationship between price and quantity demanded

b) a state law could be declared illegal if it contradicted the constitution.

explanation:

the conflict of this case originated when james w. mcculloch, a cashier of the baltimore branch of the second bank of the united states that the congress had chartered in 1816, refused to pay a tax imposed by the maryland state.

in the case, the state of maryland appealed that the establishment of a second bank was unconstitutional since the constitution didn't say anything about granting that power to congress. however, the case determined that even if such right wasn't specifically stated in the constitution, it was part of the "implied powers" of the government enunciated in article i, section 8.

the case also eliminated maryland's legislation to impose taxes to a national bank, asserting that even though the states retained the power of taxation, the constitution's laws are supreme and can not be controlled by the states, therefore, if a state law contradicts the constitution, it should be declared illegal.

explanation: