Do you think slavery would have been as widely used in the British Empire if King Charles and King James had not benefitted financially from the Royal African Company? Why or why not?​

Explanation:

If they would not have benefited someone else -- a merchant of some would have taken there place. Where money is concerned, someone always takes the chance for the benefits offered.

When money is at stake, morality has a hard time surviving.

Answer it would have made no difference. I am surprised to learn that kings were involved, but they need to fill their treasuries. Money is never enough.

d: social contract theory

this forms a narrow, steep sided inlet (sometimes deeper than 1300 metres) connected to the sea. the terminal moraine pushed down the valley by the glacier is left underwater at the fjord’s entrance, causing the water at the neck of the fjord to be shallower than the main body of the fjord behind it.