Base your answers to questions 4-6 on the excerpt below and your knowledge of social studies.
"As the American colonies continued to develop in the eighteenth century, Britain placed
increasing restriction on American manufactures to protect its growing domestic industries. No
products were expressly forbidden, but the size of markets was limited and the building of new
factories and mills for producing certain goods was forbidden.
Had these acts been enforced, they would have severely impacted the developing economies
of the North American colonies."
John Steele Gordon, historian,
The Epic History of American Economic Power, published in 2004.
Which of the following developments explains why the colonists demonstrated resistance to the act described

i dont know. sorry : (

evelyn "champagne" king

love come down

explanation:

1- in bradbury's  fahrenheit 451, all books are banned and burned upon discovery. in the nazi germany, books considered to be subversive to the regime would be burned to keep the population from generating ideologies that could challenge nazism.

2- was bradbury correct in his literal interpretation of  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.”? in some way, yes. when knowledge is not only limited, but also controlled, the people tied to it are led to their demise. just like in the novel, people in nazi germany who owned  subversive books were punished not only by the burning of their property, but also by the discrimination that followed after such a public form of consequence. if a person was seen being confiscated  subversive  books, they may be considered as an ally to the jews, which meant pretty much the same as being the enemy back then. because of the extreme exclusion and suffering that followed this punishment, it's almost like dying a slow death.

in this way, the phrase  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.” is both literal and figurative.

explanation:

mark brainliest and have a great day!

the answer is a) high entry costs