History
History, 24.05.2021 21:10, errr5529

Argue pro or con for two of the arguments from the pro/con document in this unit. 1. Path to Citizenship – Overview

Pro:

“There are an estimated 11 million undocumented immigrants currently residing in the United States. It is unrealistic and inhumane to deport these individuals from their families and lives in the United States. These immigrants should be offered a path to legal status and eventually earned citizenship. This track to citizenship should be realistic, rather than being so burdensome that it prevents integration. Allowing these immigrants to regularize their status will not only strengthen our national security, but will also stimulate the economy and enhance America’s rich, vibrant, and diverse culture.”

Con:

“As Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, I have strongly advocated for immigration reform that focuses on enforcement and upholding the rule of law, including elimination of enforcement waivers that have been abused by previous and current Administrations. To be clear, any immigration reform proposal must first guarantee that our immigration laws are enforced both at the border and within the United States. I remain opposed to amnesty, as I always have been. I do not support a special pathway to citizenship that rewards those who have broken our immigration laws.”

2. Border Fence or Wall

Pro:

“A nation without borders is not a nation. There must be a wall across the southern border… Mexico must pay for the wall and, until they do, the United States will, among other things: impound all remittance payments derived from illegal wages; increase fees on all temporary visas issued to Mexican CEOs and diplomats (and if necessary cancel them); increases fees on all border crossing cards – of which we issue about 1 million to Mexican nationals each year (a major source of visa overstays); increase fees at ports of entry to the United States from Mexico [Tariffs and foreign aid cuts are also options]. We will not be taken advantage of anymore.”

Con:

“Mexican people, we are not going to pay any single cent for such a wall! And it’s going to be completely useless… The first person of such a policy would be the United States. If this guy [Donald Trump] pretends that closing the borders to anywhere either for trade (or) for people is going to provide prosperity to the United States, he is completely crazy.”

answer
Answers: 3

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 21.06.2019 23:30, alexusjones6042
Was the battle of iwo jima over after us troops raised the flag on mt. suribachi?
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 03:00, jennywarmJones
In harriet's country, the ten provincial states that make up the nation hold the majority of power, with a small central government handling foreign policy and trade. harriet lives under a government best described as which of the selections listed below? select one: a. parliamentary b. federal c. confederal d. unitary
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 05:30, kingethan08
Write an account of the boston massacre from the point of view of a british soldier involved in the event
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 06:00, burritomadness
Yugoslavia a: nato b: warsaw pact c: not a member of either alliance
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
Argue pro or con for two of the arguments from the pro/con document in this unit. 1. Path to Citize...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
English, 05.02.2020 11:01