Early in June my college friend K'ung Hsiang Hsi came back from T'ungchou for his vacation, reporting that the
state of affairs there and at Peking was growing worse,
that the local officials were powerless against the Boxers,
and that the Boxers, armed with swords, were constantly
threatening Christians scattered in the country.

Which historical interpretation is supported by this source?

A. Christians in Shansi hoped foreign countries would conquer China.

B. Members of the Boxer movement associated Christianity with
foreignness.

C. The Boxer movement hoped to completely overthrow the Empress
Dowager

D. The Governor of Shansi is one of the most powerful people in all
of China.

it was certainly a debatable decision, mainly because it was based primarily on political - and not on legal or social - views. since the congress at that time was led by members of the republican party, and the territory that the tribes wanted to turn into an exclusively indian state was predominantly democratic, the proposal (as expressed in the constitution) did not succeed, but the constitution itself proved to be of crucial importance in the creation of the state of oklahoma, and, most importantly, it guaranteed the involvement of representatives of the indian tribes in the government of the future joint state.  

as a member of congress, i would have voted to ratify the constitution, or at least to have it tabled. ignoring it was an interested and partial decision.  

southern north america: yucatán peninsula in southern mexico extending into northern guatemala, and northern belize. these moist forests on the yucatán peninsula of south-eastern mexico are characterized by a tropical humid climate with little topographic relief.

explanation:

hey depneidng on the rooselvet your talking about theres 2 options either the new deal or the social welfare project hope this