How should the use of the Atomic Bomb against Japan be remembered? Was the use of the Atomic Bomb justified?

1. The use of the Atomic Bomb against Japan should be remembered as both a devestating and revolutionary event.

2. The morality of dropping the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was justified at the time as a means of achieving a faster success and preventing the deaths of more Americans. However, using this device believing that it would kill people and ruin the urban environment was obviously immoral. And it wasn't really essential. Furthermore, The use of atomic weapons was, in my opinion, a mistake and a catastrophe. The bombings had no influence on Japan's decision to surrender. The proof has become overwhelming that the Soviet Union's entrance into the war against Japan on August 8, 1945, was the catalyst for Japan's surrender, but Americans find this impossible to believe.

TheAtomicbomb is what ended WW2 ,but it was by taking 100 of 1000 innocent life's. The bomb could be remembered as a triumph or as victimization of the Japanese . We see it as victimization of the Japanese. Hope it helps you.

its b wells tried to fight lynching in the south by

united kingdom

portugal

france

germany