6. The Dred Scott decision can be seen as supporting which side of the slavery debate? A. The Northern states
B. The Southern states
C. The neutralists
D. The abolitionists

B

Explanation:  The Dred Scott Decision enraged the North (particularly the abolitionists) because they believed that Congress supported slavery in the South.  The South (particularly slave owners) was satisfied with this decision because Congress claimed that they had no right to remove property that was owned by another, in other words, the slave owners had the right to keep their slaves.

explanation: we can only guess at how our actions may be perceived in the future. doing something really big like killing lots of people, saving lots of people, affecting the lives of lots of people is a sure fire way of being remembered in historical records. we can also make a difference in the history records by being a small influence on something bigger, whether that is as a civil servant, scientist or artist.

of course you could argue that we all affect history just as tiny cogs in a   bigger machine.

if you mean how do people influence our opinions of things which have already happened, then simply by writing a book which looks at things form a different perspective and trying to convince people that this perspective is more accurate or truthful. people do it all the time i.e. richard the third was a terrible or was he? plenty would disagree, it's just that their views aren't the most widely known.n:

bismarck believed in using force

is the correct answer!