In offering his eloquent defense of civil disobedience,* King justifies his willingness to break laws by claiming that one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws, those that are out of harmony with "the moral law or the law of God." Can we citizens of a pluralistic society know with certainty—and agree—on the content of the moral law or the law of God?

alaska is the answer to this

i think the answer is a and i hope this ; ))

the supreme court can hear any case it wishes as long as four justices agree to hear it.

hope this , give me brainliest answer =j

in 1859, brown and 21 of his followers attacked and occupied the federal arsenal in harper's ferry. their goal was to capture supplies and use them to arm a slave rebellion. brown was captured during the raid and later hanged, but not before becoming an anti-slavery icon. abolitionist and insurrectionist

explanation: