The graphs show demographic changes in the United States. A bar chart titled Region of Origin of Immigrants shows Europe and Asia/Latin America immigrants in millions. From Europe: 1960, 7; 1970, 5; 1980, 4.5; 1990, 4; 2000, 4; 2010, 4. From Asia/Latin America: 1960, 2; 1970, 3; 1980, 6.5; 1990, 13; 2000, 24; 2010, 32.

A bar chart titled Projected Population of U S In 2000, White non Hispanic, 70 percent; other races and ethnicities, 30 percent. In 2050, White non Hispanic, 50 percent; other races and ethnicities 50 percent.

The best conclusion that can be drawn from these graphs is that in the future the United States will

have a majority of people from Asia.
be a “majority-minority” nation.
be more racially homogeneous.
have a majority of people born in other countries.

they charge for servic mark me brainliest

since most of current immigration into the u.s., both legal and illegal, is coming from latin america. it would be very difficult to imagine or rationalize a country my fellow citizens are trying desperately to flee into, would pose a threat to my prosperity or freedom. since the u.s. has a long history of intervention, but no record of permanent occupation, i would not feel oppression is the main objective.  

the largest free trade nation, along with the largest gdp in the world wanting to expand it's economic policy on us, and including us, could only be positive. the u.s. government has no interest in, or way of simply forcing american culture on us. and has no track record of it. other nations that adopted american social culture, or "americanization" did so voluntarily, mainly through the choice of allowing american businesses and u.s. citizens to come into their nations, as free operatives.

no one really purchased it themselves, it was all america, they had debates etc.

use wikipedia, i think they have this.