History
History, 23.04.2021 18:50, creeper2737

Which of the following best describes the U. S. Supreme Court's ruling in the Dred Scott v. Sandford case in regards to the Missouri Compromise and popular sovereignty? Group of answer choices

Both the Missouri Compromise and popular sovereignty were deemed to be unconstitutional

Both the Missouri Compromise and popular sovereignty were deemed to be constitutional

The Missouri Compromise as constitutional, but popular sovereignty was unconstitutional

The Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional, but popular sovereignty was constitutional

answer
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 21.06.2019 20:00, thebestandrew922
Robert morris proposed a 10 percent tax on imported goods to pay the national debt. true or false
Answers: 1
image
History, 21.06.2019 23:30, samueldfhung
What side of the american civil war would you choose to fight for and why
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 02:00, Jasten
Abody of water that is surrounded by land on three sides and leads to a larger body of water is called
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 04:30, charityclark3935
Why might the spanish government have approved of the encomienda system? a the system allowed for fair treatment of all under it, leading to a happy and prosperous colony. b the system used natives as slaves which meant the government was able to maximize their profit of exported goods. c the system allowed for mostly profitable trade within the different colonies. d the system was a great example of how to successfully run a colony, making spain a world power.
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
Which of the following best describes the U. S. Supreme Court's ruling in the Dred Scott v. Sandford...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 17.07.2019 18:00