Help pleas 20 pointsss the United States has had a two-party political system for much of its history. Currently, most elected officials at the state and federal levels, including the presidency, are members of either the Democratic Party or the Republican Party. Do you think this the two-party system is fair? Or, do you think the nation would benefit from having more officials from third-parties elected into offices? Suppose that you could propose a third party? Describe the purpose of you party, including the name you would give to it and the political platform it would embrace.

ok well i'm not sure  if this would help you but this is what I say since i just learned about this last week

Explanation:

Now I think the two party system is fair more so because most people have different ideas from each of the party's.But when it comes election time they have to pick people from both of the party's so they could go against each other in the presidential election.

Sorry if i only answered some of it

the indies

explanation:

because it's pure common sense, google it

pepin the short[a] (german: pippin der kurze, french: pépin le bref, c. 714 – 24 september 768) was the king of the franks from 751 until his death. he was the first of the carolingians to become king.[b][2]

the younger son of the frankish prince charles martel and his wife rotrude, pepin's upbringing was distinguished by the ecclesiastical education he had received from the monks of st. denis. succeeding his father as the mayor of the palace in 741, pepin reigned over francia jointly with his elder brother carloman. pepin ruled in neustria, burgundy, and provence, while his brother carloman established himself in austrasia, alemannia and thuringia. the brothers were active in suppressing revolts led by the bavarians, aquitanians, saxons, and the alemanni in the early years of their reign. in 743, they ended the frankish interregnum by choosing childeric iii, who was to be the last merovingian monarch, as figurehead king of the franks.