What were three eventual consequences of william the conquerors victory at hastings?

The Battle of Hastings took place on October 14, 1066 about ten kilometers north of the city of Hastings in East Sussex. It opposed the last Anglo-Saxon king of England, Harold Godwinson, to the duke of Normandy William the Conqueror, who finally obtained a decisive victory.

Hastings was part of the crisis of succession opened by the death of the King of England Edward the Confessor in January 1066. Elected successor of Edward, Harold had to face the invasions launched by pretenders to the crown. He defeated Norwegian King Harald Hardrada on September 25 at Stamford Bridge in Yorkshire, but at the same time, Duke William of Normandy landed in Sussex, in the south of the country, more than 350 km away from there. Harold rushed to meet him in a forced march.

The battle lasted from morning until the evening of October 14th. Posted at the top of Caldbec Hill, the English troops resisted the first enemy assaults behind their wall of shields. The Normans then resorted to a ruse: the left wing pretended to flee before turning on the English launched in their pursuit. The English army finally yielded and disbanded after Harold's death, and the victory fell to William.  

Thanks to his victory, the Duke of Normandy was crowned King of England on Christmas Day at Westminster. Even though the Norman conquest of England was not really completed until several years later, the Battle of Hastings marked a turning point in the history of England, as it was the opening of which is known as the Anglo-Norman period.

answer: a parliamentary system is a system of democratic governance of a state where the executive derives its democratic legitimacy from its ability to command the confidence of the legislature, typically a parliament, and is also held accountable to that parliament. in a parliamentary system, the head of state is usually a person distinct from the head of government. this is in contrast to a presidential system, where the head of state often is also the head of government and, most importantly, the executive does not derive its democratic legitimacy from the legislature.

countries with parliamentary democracies may be constitutional monarchies, where a monarch is the head of state while the head of government is almost always a member of parliament (such as the united kingdom, denmark, sweden, and japan), or parliamentary republics, where a mostly ceremonial president is the head of state while the head of government is regularly from the legislature (such as ireland, germany, india, and italy). in a few parliamentary republics, such as botswana, south africa, and suriname, among some others, the head of government is also head of state, but is elected by and is answerable to parliament. in bicameral parliaments, the head of government is generally, though not always, a member of the lower house.

parliamentarianism is the dominant form of government in europe, with 32 of its 50 sovereign states being parliamentarian. it is also common in the caribbean, being the form of government of 10 of its 13 island states, and in oceania. elsewhere in the world, parliamentary countries are less common, but they are distributed through all continents, most often in former colonies of the british empire that subscribe to a particular brand of parliamentarianism known as the westminster system.

explanation:

the 9th amendment

explanation: