History
History, 01.02.2020 00:03, duracohack

Which of the following best describes the miranda v. arizona case and its significance?

miranda v. arizona was about being wrongly identified by an accuser. the case create a rule that more than an accuser's identification was needed for an arrest.

miranda v. arizona was about confessing without an attorney present. the case create a rule that an attorney must be present for suspects being questioned by police.

miranda v. arizona was about protecting a person's 5th and 6th amendment rights. the ruling gave police the burden of reminding citizens of their rights when arrested.

miranda v. arizona was about a signed confession obtained by conspiracy between police and miranda's attorney. the judge ruled that attorneys must be self or court appointed.

answer
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 21.06.2019 15:20, Hudman57
Which option best summarizes what is expected of citizens in a domocracy?
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 05:00, amcda213040
In at least two paragraphs, discuss the differences between the principles of republicanism and democracy. explain whether you think the united states is more of a republic or a democracy. refer to at least one example from the constitution. (10 points)
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 07:30, megamorph
Answer the questions in the image for brainliest
Answers: 2
image
History, 22.06.2019 07:50, smeeden
How is the u. s. military restricted by the third amendment? o a. the military can't confiscate people's weapons. o b. the military can't require people to serve unless a war has been declared. o c. the military can't take action against one of the states. o d. the military can't force people to host soldiers in their homes. submit
Answers: 2