What does the debate between madison and jefferson tell us about the importance of compromise?

The debate between Madison and Jefferson tell us about the importance of compromise in a way that the word itself, compromise, is rare and a way of having to say that there are times that two people couldn’t have the sense of having to see one perspective or views in regards with political issues and such and that having compromise and making them is essential in life or in as you do your everyday task as it serves as a component of helping one individual.

president carter called the victims of kidnapping "victims of terrorism and anarchy" and added that the united states was not going to give in to blackmail. in the united states, they see hostage-taking as an outrage on the part of the islamist movement that violated the principle of international law on the immunity and inviolability of diplomats and their embassies.

carter refused to yield to the demands, khomeini used the situation to consolidate his power and nullify the challenges of the moderate wing of his government, headed by its president. the euphoria over the humiliation of the most powerful nation distracted the iranian people from the economic difficulties of their country. carter, in april 1980, broke diplomatic relations with iran and imposed a trade embargo, except medicine and food. iranian funds in the us they were frozen and accounted for to compensate the hostages when they were released and to pay the demands of us companies against iran.