How did the white league try to reduce the number of freedmen voting for republican candidates?
a: by rewarding freedmen with money and jobs if they voted for democratic candidates
b: byshowing freedmen how they would benefit from election of the democratic candidates
c: by convincing freedmen that reconstruction would end if they voted for republican candidates
d: by acting violently towards freedmen who tried to vote for republican candidates

  The correct answer is the D. By acting violently towards freedmen who tried to vote for Republican candidates.

  The White League was a paramilitary terrorist organization created on 1874 to kick Republican out of office from the Southern States. They did this by intimidating with violence the freedmen and its allied whites from political organizing and voting.

  The White League achieved in 1876 the control of the Democrats in the Louisian Legislature by supressing the Republican votes. After this its members were absorbed into the states militias and the National Guard.

  Hope the answer is correct.

it was bribing i think i might be wrong though

the covenant that god made with abraham was a unilateral (one-sided) promise from god to abraham.   apart from anything abraham did, god was promising that he was going to bring about a great nation from abraham's offspring, and that the messiah (meaning "the anointed one") would come from abraham's descendants, as one through whom the whole world would receive favor from god.   as god promised abraham, "through your offspring all nations on earth will be blessed" (genesis 22: 18).

the "new covenant" was announced by jesus of nazareth, who had asserted that he was the "son of david" (and descendant of abraham) that fulfilled those promises to abraham.   when jesus introduced the sacred meal that we now refer to as the lord's supper, as told his disciples in reference to the wine they drank, "this cup is the new covenant in my blood, which is poured out for you" (luke 22: 20).   this "new covenant" through jesus was also a unilateral (one-sided) covenant.   he gave himself in sacrifice for all people, without conditions attached.   as his friend and apostle john later wrote, "he is the atoning sacrifice for our sins, and not only for ours but also for the sins of the whole world" (1 john 2: 2).

so the covenant with abraham and the "new covenant" ushered in by jesus are, in essence, connected as one covenant -- because jesus was saying he was the one promised to abraham that fulfilled that covenant and brought blessing to the world.