Sudden changes in society are often described as revolutions. advances in technology can result in revolutions in science and the workforce. dissatisfaction with a government can lead to a political revolution. under what circumstances is it likely that these changes will occur? are there circumstances in which these changes should not occur?

I believe that the driving factor in the initiation and origin of revolutions, of any kind, is the need that people have on a specific subject. For example, when people initiated scientific research to the point of discovering and generating technological changes, the driving factor was the need for something.

Not all revolutions are alike, and most scientific and technological revolutions, have been born from times of peace and surpluss, when there was enough support for these to take place. But there was always the fact of need; need for money, need for power from nations to outdo another, race between powers to gain control, etc. In the case of workforce revolutions, people had the need for new policies to be created because the ones they had were insufferable.

Finally, if you take the case of political revolutions, people often revolt because a system of government is either unfair, or does not meet the needs of the people. So people want change, and if it is not given, they seek to make it happen through force.

the civil war was a fulfillment and completion of the constitution, not a revolution against it. changes in culture and society surely affected political life. lincoln hoped to bring the north and south together after the war by healing the nationand making people lose their resentment.

hope this you out just took thus test a min go and mad a 100

        i'm fairly sure that the correct answers are 2 and 3.

        i used both my knowledge of world history and the process of elimination to obtain these answers. option 1 cannot be a possible selection because the mandate of heaven belongs to ancient chinese philosophical belief. option 4 sounds like it would benefit the region than detriment it. however, both 2 and 3 explain a potential reason for what could have contributed to the fall of the roman empire.

      hope this ! if i were you, i'd get a second opinion, because i haven't taken this course for a year. best of luck!

***websites that me understand the curriculum better last year are and ***