How did european imperialism in india differ from european imperialism in china during the 18th and 19th centuries?
a. europeans took almost absolute control over india’s government, but focused only on securing trading rights in china.
b. europeans were concerned only with exporting goods to markets in india, but were concerned only with importing goods from china.
c. europeans used military force to take control of china, but used diplomacy to establish trade colonies in india.
d. europeans contributed to economic collapse in india, but contributed to strengthening the economy in china.

A. Europeans took almost absolute control over India’s government, but focused only on securing trading rights in China.

Explanation:

English imperialism in China and India brought altogether different reactions, to a limited extent on account of the idea of colonialism in each spot. While the two districts were incredibly impacted by the British, in India the nation was put under the immediate guideline of the Queen. In China then again, the "ranges of prominence"spheres of influence were financial, and did not involve direct British principle. Amid the British magnificent age the way of life of China proceeded on much equivalent to it had previously, while in India the British attempted to supplant the Indian culture with their own. English influence in China started with the presentation of the opium drug. In England this medication was at that point generally being used, even among Christians.

answer: idk

explanation:

well the fact it is basically a peninsula allowed trade to come from many places, thus allowing cultural diffusion to take place. india has seasonal monsoons that merchants travel back and forth from india using the monsoons wind patterns