![History](/tpl/images/cats/istoriya.png)
In the case of tinker v. des moines independent community school district (1969), the court ruled that symbolic speech, like wearing armbands as a form of protest, is
a. protected by the first amendment
b. not protected by first amendment
c. protected by the first amendment, except in the case of individuals younger than 21
d. protected by the second amendment’s protection of the right to bear arms
![answer](/tpl/images/cats/otvet.png)
Answers: 2
Similar questions
![Предмет](/tpl/images/cats/en.png)
English, 08.08.2019 23:10, jholland03
Answers: 1
![Предмет](/tpl/images/cats/istoriya.png)
![Предмет](/tpl/images/cats/istoriya.png)
![Предмет](/tpl/images/cats/en.png)
English, 20.09.2019 22:00, jeanieb
Answers: 3
Do you know the correct answer?
In the case of tinker v. des moines independent community school district (1969), the court ruled th...
Questions in other subjects:
![Konu](/tpl/images/cats/mat.png)
![Konu](/tpl/images/cats/en.png)
![Konu](/tpl/images/cats/ekonomika.png)
![Konu](/tpl/images/cats/mat.png)
![Konu](/tpl/images/cats/ekonomika.png)
![Konu](/tpl/images/cats/en.png)
![Konu](/tpl/images/cats/mat.png)
Mathematics, 21.02.2020 00:43
![Konu](/tpl/images/cats/mat.png)
![Konu](/tpl/images/cats/informatica.png)