What best describes the impact of people changing from hunter-gatherers to living in permanent agricultural societies?

a.)hunter-gatherers relied on a narrower variety of foods compared to grain producing agricultural societies.

b.) hunter-gatherers made little impact on the land versus “slash and burn” techniques used by agricultural societies.

c.) hunter-gatherers domesticated more animals during the winter months compared to agricultural societies.

d.) hunter-gatherers endangered many species due to overkilling compared to agricultural societies.

B.) Hunter-gatherers made little impact on the land versus “slash and burn” techniques used by agricultural societies.

Explanation:

Although not all civilizations used the "slash and burn" method, it is fair to say that in general, hunter-gatherers made little impact on the land when compared to agricultural societies. Hunter-gatherers could only use the resources that were naturally present in an area. If these were exhausted, they had to relocate. This gave nature the change to recover before more people came again. In this way, the balance of life was maintained and very little impact on the environment was made by humans.

both are true, the congress does have the power to create banks, even if this power is not specifically described in the constitution, since there is nothing restricting it and there is power given to the congress to make "all laws which shall be necessary and proper". maryland was not allowed to tax a branch of the national bank operating there, and the supreme court decided that no state could. both of these topics were discussed in a decision of the mcculloch v. maryland case in 1819.