John Locke's philosophy, which states that people have the right to life, liberty, and property. Is there a political philosophy in the Declaration of Independence? One step toward answering this questionânot the only step, but from the philosopherâs point of view the most fundamentalâis to ask whether the âself-evident truthsâ of the Declaration are really true after all. Another way of putting it, which I once saw in a conference title, is to ask whether the âself-evident truthsâ are fact or fiction.I have to admit that âfact or fictionâ struck me at first as an odd way of questioning the authenticity of truths, but on reflection I decided it was a particularly felicitous turn of phrase. Living in a pragmatic age, we tend to equate fact with truth, and fiction with falsehood. There is something characteristically American about such a way of thinking. Still, it is important at the outset to recognize that this frame of mind is not universal. No less an authority than Aristotle writes that fiction (poetry) is âmore philosophic and more seriousâ than fact (history), because it speaks of universals rather than particulars; there is more truth in understanding the soul of a man like Homerâs Odysseus than in knowing, to quote Aristotle, what âAlcibiades did or had done to himâ1âor even, did not do or have done to him, as students of Platoâs Symposium will understand. I will return to the question of fact and its relation to truth, but my point at the outset is that part of the question of whether there is a political philosophy in the Declaration is whether what the Declaration proclaims as self-evident truths really are true.     But that is not the whole of the question. As others have pointed out, the Declaration does not say, âThese truths are self-evident. . . .â It says, instead, that âwe holdâ them to be so. If we understand âphilosophyâ as it is often understood, in the sense of a doctrine, and if we understand âpolitical philosophyâ as political science departments often do, as a synonym for political theory, then the question of whether there is a political philosophy in the Declaration is the question of whether the Declaration binds us to a particular political creed.I say âbindsâ because the Declaration is treated, even today, as authoritative law in one sense: It is printed at the head of the United States Code, where it is considered the first of our organic laws. More to the point, politically today the Declaration of Independence has no open enemies; it is the touchstone of our political arguments rather than an object of advocacy any more. Even those who dismiss the American founders as racist or sexist want to keep the Declaration. They accuse the founders of hypocrisy rather than mistaken principle. It is not only that no one wants to be on the wrong side of the Declaration, but that even the charges made against the Declarationâs authors seem to be anchored in the Declarationâs own principle of equality. Whether or not that principle and the other purported truths that accompany it are true, they would seem in fact to be the first principles of our regime. - See more at: https://home.isi.org/there-political-philosophy-declaration-independence#sthash.rp6sSTQI.dpuf