(easy question i don't remember the answer to)

would it be possible to have a socialist direct democracy?

a) no, in a socialist society only a few high-ranking members of the communist party have political power.

b) no, a direct democracy requires a free market economy which is not socialist.

c) yes, if everyone voted on economic decisions rather than letting markets decide them, then it could be considered a socialist direct democracy.

d) yes, if the society was ruled by a king who made the majority of economic decisions, it could be considered a socialist direct democracy.

Which group of native arkansas used northwestern arkansas as its traditional hunting grounds? osage mississippian woodland quapaw 35 points plz

Will give brainliest and a will put up a free point questionthe following question refers to a hypothetical situation. the 2010 supreme court case, wagner v. tritch, involves the illegal distribution of copyrighted material to foreign consumers via the internet, which is a new area of law. the 9-0, unanimous vote on the court is set to overturn the lower appellate court decision that augustus tritch was liable for millions of dollars to the plaintiff, frederick von wagner, for illegally distributing his book to overseas customers. now that the court has voted on the case, explain what must happen next? describe the different types of opinions that could come from the court.

Need answers to all questions for this paper