History, 05.10.2019 07:00, juansantos3328

Which of the following best explains the outcome and significance of the case described?

a: in miranda v. arizona the supreme court ruled that it is the attorney's duty to inform suspects of their rights.

b: in miranda v. arizona, the supreme court decided that it is the citizens' responsibility to be aware of their own rights.

c: in gideon v. wainwright, the supreme court decided that every person who was convicted at trial and did not have an attorney deserves a new trial.

d: in gideon v. wainwright, the supreme court ruled that every state must provide an attorney when the defendant cannot afford one.

Answers: 2

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: History

History, 21.06.2019 14:30, dion27

Who was captured in 1430 by the english and burned at the stake in 1431? isabelle philip iv katherine joan of arc

Answers: 1

continue

History, 21.06.2019 20:50, kaykay9243

Match the leaders with their goals at the yalta conference of 1945. franklin roosevelt winston churchill joseph stalin wanted to prevent future threats from germany wanted free elections in eastern europe wanted soviet against japan

Answers: 2

continue

History, 22.06.2019 02:00, magaaalimartinez

What was one of the main accomplishments of louis ix? a) he was made a saint after his death b) he eliminated trials by jury. c) he called the first french parliament. d) he ended the taxation system.

Answers: 1

continue

History, 22.06.2019 09:50, kaylaelaine18

After early colonial losses to the british in new york, a. general washington withdrew his troops to pennsylvania. b. the colonies ratified the declaration of independence. c. the continental army set up headquarters at fort lee. d. general washington set up headquarters in new jersey.

Answers: 2

continue

Do you know the correct answer?

Which of the following best explains the outcome and significance of the case described?