History
History, 03.02.2020 08:52, zinai123

From justice stevens's dissent from the supreme court's decision in the 2000 bush vs. gore case:

"it is confidence in the men and women who administer the judicial system that is the true backbone of the rule of law. time will one day heal the wound to that confidence that will be inflicted by today's decision. one thing, however, is certain. although we may never know with complete certainty the identity of the winner of this year's presidential election, the identity of the loser is perfectly clear. it is the nation's confidence in the judge as an impartial guardian of the rule of law."
justice stevens implies that
a) americans are divided on the "bush vs gore" case.
b) americans are tired of this case, and want to see things resolved.
c) to the court's decision, a divided nation has once more been united.
d) to the court's decision, americans have lost trust in judges to act impartially.

answer
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 21.06.2019 17:00, carlalopezelox9533
Is the idea of containment relevant to american foreign and policy today why or why not
Answers: 1
image
History, 21.06.2019 22:30, moutchyjoseph
What was herbert hoover and the food administration do in wwi?
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 10:30, katlynnschmolke
What was a goal of the treaty of versailles? to germany rebuild its industry to build better roads and factories in germany to make sure germany did not invade france in the future to give great britain and the united states credit for their in wwi
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 14:00, myrkaxsanchezz
What was the outcome of the election of 1800
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
From justice stevens's dissent from the supreme court's decision in the 2000 bush vs. gore case:

Questions in other subjects: